One of the most prestigious doctors of the modern era was Arnold Relman, MD.
“The message to medicine,” says Arnold S. Relman, MD, the retiring editor of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), “is that physicians must give up the way their incomes are currently made and distributed if we are to make the American healthcare system work in the future.”
Relman, who is known to friends by his folksy childhood nickname, “Bud,” is a blunt-spoken man whose prickly views of the faults of the “medical-industrial complex” have made him a controversial figure. As the formidable editor of the influential NEJM, he has championed the cause that medicine “should be the stuff of social service, not unbridled entrepreneurship.”
Dr. Relman once said, as published in the New Republic magazine,
“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research,” says Arnold Relman, a Harvard professor and former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, whose recent critique of the industry’s influence in health care, published in the New Republic, won him and his co-author one of the top awards for magazine journalism in the United States. “The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
The Journal of the American Medical Association published an article titled, “Addressing the Long-term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children and Families.”
This article is “too little – too late.” It addresses placing bandages on wounds that the American Medical Association allowed to occur but could have prevented. Here is a short list of avoidable issues that led to this pandemic.
- Promote medical school nutritional education and application of this information as part of clinical encounters.
- Eliminate ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
- Demand clinical trials be conducted by organizations without a financial interest in the outcome.
- Take a stand for viable drugs and natural treatments that could have averted “emergency use authorization.”
- Demand all studies on the mRNA and other jab technologies be made public and be reviewed by medical teams without a financial interest in the technology.
- Discourage private-public partnerships that takes authority away from the medical profession while placing it on regulators and private interests.
Here are some excerpts from the American Medical Association article.
“My mom lost her business…we were trying to maintain everything but the bills just kept piling up. Food prices went up, rent, everything went up.…We didn’t know if we were gonna get food the next day, if we were even going to have our place.…It got to the point where I wasn’t able to sleep properly anymore or eat properly anymore, and I did gain a lot of anxiety and depression.”
“In the US more than 265 000 children have lost a parent or caregiver to COVID-19. The number of bereaved US children is high overall but there are important differences: in 753 White children lost a parent or caregiver to COVID-19, but rates for Black (1 in 310), Latino (1 in 412), and Native American (1 in 168) children are even higher, and portend a cascade of negative effects that can follow if appropriate supports are not ensured for these children and their families throughout their continued development.”
Can you guess how many articles on vaccine injuries are published within the Journal of the American Medical Association network?
ANSWER: 1
Our major medical association is not controlled by the needs of patients.
If you are vaccine injured, your American Medical Association does not care.
